falsafe molasadra
sayyed mohammad hosain naghibi; Abdollah Nasri
Abstract
The actuality of the soul in the emergence of perception accepted by Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. The acceptance of this view has two fundamental questions that shape the focus of the present research. The first question is how the power soul has a perceptual appearance, while at the very beginning it lacks ...
Read More
The actuality of the soul in the emergence of perception accepted by Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. The acceptance of this view has two fundamental questions that shape the focus of the present research. The first question is how the power soul has a perceptual appearance, while at the very beginning it lacks it. And in the second question, considering that desires and sensual tendencies are in the direction of effective will, how can one between the selfish self-activity in the emergence of perception and the theory of conformity and the criterion of the truth of that collective form in response to The first question is expressed that the soul first accepts and after the study of the queen of the form, an object appears and in response to The second question states that self-determination in education is the basis of the emergence of perceptual forms. Also, self-actualization is related to the sensory forms of the subject matter, whose will does not interfere with it, and in relation to the first testimonies of the soul, it is necessary to make predicate proof for the subject and In the assertions of the theorem that returns to the axioms, when the initiation of analogy is put together, the result is derived from the causal principle, and the will of the soul does not interfere in determining the outcome, hence the inference does not conform to the viewpoint.
falsafe molasadra
Hossein Islami; Abdollah Nasri
Abstract
In discussing about motion, the possibility or impossibility of motion in abstract beings is one of the central problems. This problem has a strong relation to the problem of reality of chaos and first matter. Peripatetic philosophers, in one hand, through arguments, such as “argument by potentiality ...
Read More
In discussing about motion, the possibility or impossibility of motion in abstract beings is one of the central problems. This problem has a strong relation to the problem of reality of chaos and first matter. Peripatetic philosophers, in one hand, through arguments, such as “argument by potentiality and actuality” and “separation- connection proof’ have assert that the chaos is a real corporeal being. Because abstract beings are, according to them, devoid of matter, they have founded the reality of motion on the material reality of the chaos. So, they rejected the existence of motion in abstract beings. By contrast, many contemporary philosophers rejected the arguments about real existence of the chaos, and denied the correlation between real chaos and existence of motion, and, so, they have asset the possibility of motion in abstract beings. The other essential problem, that its solution come after the problem of ‘possibility of motion in the abstract beings’ is the problem of ‘substantial motion in the soul’ and the problem of ‘evolution of soul in isthmus life and resurrection’.
